If your employee fails to serve a grievance notice, the NIRC may dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer hasn't had a possibility to answer the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In some cases, the NIRC may well allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to incorporate the grievance notice. However, this is generally only finished Should the employee can show that they'd a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. In the present case, the parties were allowed to steer evidence plus the petitioner company responded for the allegations as such they were properly conscious of the allegations and led the evidence therefore this point is ofno use for being appeared into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman Source: Order: Downloads 204 Order Date: 04-FEB-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp

Some pluralist systems, for example Scots law in Scotland and types of civil legislation jurisdictions in Quebec and Louisiana, do not specifically in good shape into the dual common-civil legislation system classifications. These types of systems might have been closely influenced via the Anglo-American common legislation tradition; however, their substantive regulation is firmly rooted within the civil legislation tradition.

In that feeling, case regulation differs from one particular jurisdiction to another. For example, a case in Ny would not be decided using case law from California. As an alternative, Ny courts will review the issue depending on binding precedent . If no previous decisions to the issue exist, New York courts could possibly check out precedents from a different jurisdiction, that would be persuasive authority relatively than binding authority. Other factors for example how aged the decision is along with the closeness into the facts will affect the authority of the specific case in common law.

Persuasive Authority – Prior court rulings that could be consulted in deciding a current case. It might be used to guide the court, but is just not binding precedent.

13 . Const. P. 209/2025 (S.B.) Saifullah Jamali (Disable) V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi After arguing the matter at some size, both parties have agreed towards the disposal of the moment petition about the premise that the DIGP Malir will hear the petitioner as well as private respondents and will choose care of the many facets of the case and ensure that no harassment shall be caused to both the parties.

While there is not any prohibition against referring to case law from a state other than the state in which the case is being read, it holds little sway. Still, if there isn't any precedent in the home state, relevant case legislation from another state may be thought of with the court.

27 . Const. P. 4002/2011 (D.B.) Ibrahim Noor V/S Pakistan International Airways Corporation & Ors. Sindh High Court, Karachi Even, if a petitioner was acquitted inside of a criminal case following a conviction, in NAB Reference No. twenty/2011, this does not automatically cause exoneration from departmental charges based to the same factual grounds. Even though a writ under Article 199 is obtainable in specific limited situations, it's generally not the right remedy to contest a dismissal from service based on these charges, particularly when the employee was afforded a full opportunity to cross-look at witnesses and present his/her defense but did not convince the department of his/her innocence.

We've been an independent branch of government constitutionally entrusted with the fair and just resolution of disputes in order to preserve the rule of legislation also to protect the rights and liberties guaranteed because of the Constitution and laws from the United States and this State.

On June 16, 1999, a lawsuit was filed on behalf from the boy by a guardian ad litem, against DCFS, the social worker, as well as the therapist. A similar lawsuit was also filed on behalf with the Roe’s victimized son by a different guardian advertisement litem. The defendants petitioned the trial court for just a dismissal based on absolute immunity, as they were all acting in their jobs with DCFS.

Article 199 on the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other ample remedy is provided by legislation." It truly is perfectly-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust accessible remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether All those remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more

Consequently, this petition is hereby disposed of in the terms stated higher than. However no harassment shall be caused to possibly party as well as the case shall be decided by the competent court of regulation if pending. Read more

Any court may well seek to distinguish the present case from that of a binding precedent, to succeed in a different conclusion. The validity of this type of distinction may or may not be accepted on appeal of that judgment into a higher court.

17 . Const. P. 5/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI forty six I have listened to the discovered counsel for your parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments given that the issues of your matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard on the interim relief application in terms of Section 7(1) of your Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 at hand over possession in the subjected premises to the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs to generally be decided with the competent court after hearing the parties if pending as the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer in the Illegal Dispossession case and as far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court should see this element for interim custody of the subject premises if the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two months from the date of receipt of this order. Read more

refers to regulation that will come from decisions made by judges in previous cases. Case regulation, also known as “common regulation,” and “case precedent,” delivers a common contextual read more background for certain legal concepts, And just how These are applied in certain types of case.